A question was asked today about what the difference was between and

I’ve got to admit I wondered the same, let’s do it out and see. Let be the components of the Minkowski metric tensor (just so we have something to work with. Let be a second rank tensor with matrix representation:

Calculate as opposed to and compare your answers (I’m having some trouble putting in matrix equations into WordPress at the moment).

But first look carefully at the above, these are two different expressions (on both sides of the equals sign). As coefficients we can invoke the commutativity of multiplication, so but if we want to think of this as matrix multiplication, letting G be the metric tensor and A be the matrix represented by the components above,

BUT!

and we know that in general , and this is basically what’s going on with the mixed tensor. The order of matrix multiplication depends on which indices are being contracted over and the *placement/position* of indices indicates this non-commutativity.

And so we see, for this example, that because of . But this isn’t the end of the story, the above is a justification via calculations. I suspect that there are at least two other justifications. (1) A physical justification. The mixed rank tensor in question would be the Lorentz boost. (2) A geometrical justification. Anyway, hope this helps.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## About because0fbeauty

Fascinated by the way mathematics and physics interact, captivated by visual and tactile mathematics and hoping to become a better expositor of these things is why I blog...occasionally...when I remember.